Apricot Kernels – Some Work, Some Don’t
I’d first wish to stress that apricot kernels must be used intelligently and safely. It’s possible to overwhelm our natural capacities to process amygdalin safely and without adverse reactions. We do not want these reactions, and that we can avoid them treading carefully. The variation in amygdalin concentrations from one kernel to subsequent makes it necessary to be particularly cautious and dismissive of general dosage recommendations organic dried figs.
I had some electronic message with a private who had been purchasing his kernels from a supplier in Australia. Following a short-lived ban of their kernels and closure of their site, this individual was forced to get his apricot seed from another supplier, as were many others. Having made the idea that each bitter apricot seed is an equivalent, this individual continued to use these kernels at an equivalent rate he had been using the first kernels. What he didn’t realize was that the first apricot kernels had a way higher concentration of amygdalin, which meant that he had slashed his dosage by a big margin. The result was a significant decline in his state of wellness. Fortunately, he connected this downturn and, therefore, the quality of those replacement apricot seeds. By this stage, the first supplier was copy and running. He later became aware that this other vendor was selling away inferior, imported kernel from India.
All bitter apricot kernels aren’t equivalent, nor are they similar enough to use an equivalent dosage to all or any cultivars. The range of amygdalin per kilogram of commercially available apricot kernels is vast – from roughly 3,000 mg/kg to about 50,000 mg/kg. This complete range is being sold and marketed as bitter apricot kernels, with implications for therapeutic applications’ suitability. An outsized percentage of apricot kernel vendors are taking advantage of their use as an alternate cancer therapy. Most, however, would be unaware that their products have little to no efficacy in this regard.
In the very bitter varieties, like those containing 50,000 mg/kg, just 15 kernels is roughly like 500 mg of amygdalin. In contrast, 15 kernels on the lower end of the bitterness scale yield just 30 mg of amygdalin. One would need to consume 250 kernels to realize 500 mg of amygdalin. Fifteen kernels versus 250 kernels. A daily dosage is upwards of 60 kernels by standard dosage guidelines – spread throughout the day. That’s roughly 2,000 mg of amygdalin per day within the very bitter variety. Except for those not conscious of the importance of a correctly bitter source of kernels, 60 kernels per day could be yielding just 120 mg of amygdalin. You’ll now see how some kernels are effective where others fail to hit the mark, ultimately impacting the perception of efficacy across the board. If we were all using an appropriately bitter apricot kernel, we could reasonably assume that the success rates might be much, much higher.
Sixty apricot kernels per day might sound very high to you and, supported the number of the reading you would encounter online, 60 kernels might sound a dangerously high number. Sixty kernels certainly won’t be correct for all individuals. That number could also be a good bit lower or, it’d even be higher. The daily quantity should be tailored to the individual experience. Be sensible and responsible. Most significantly, don’t rush it.
Take it upon yourself to understand where your apricot kernels come from. Do not be lured by marketing spin, like “Humza” or “Humza region”. These are simply terms wont to give imported kernels from Pakistan or India credit. All apricot kernels imported end masse have undergone undesirable treatments required by the customs/quarantine departments of the planet. They’re typically old and either rancid or often on their way. Choose local whenever possible. If you’re in Canada, us or Australia, home-grown options are readily available to you. Choose the foremost bitter kernel available, which is that the kernel containing the foremost amygdalin. If you want to use imported kernels, purchase only from reputable sources.
Alex may be a long-time user of apricot kernels and an advocate and passionate researcher of unconventional therapies. With over ten years of experience within the field, he has engaged with many individuals who have used apricot kernels as a nutritional component of metabolic protocols. With experience, one begins to acknowledge common denominators.
Umar Nisar was born and raised in the busy city of Abbottabad. As a journalist, Umar Nisar has contributed to many online publications including PAK Today and the Huffing Post. In regards to academics, Umar Nisar earned a degree in business from the Abbottabad UST, Havelian. Umar Nisar follows the money and covers all aspects of emerging tech here at The Hear Up.
When Can You Sue For Getting Cancer?
Being diagnosed with cancer can be devastating and affect anyone at any age. Several factors, such as genetics and lifestyle, can cause it. However, cancer can also be caused by the negligence of others. In such an instance, you can sue the people responsible for causing your cancer and claim compensation for the diagnosis and any associated damages.
Determining when and who to sue for getting cancer can be a complex process. So, it’s a wise idea to hire a lawyer to get you through the process and get the compensation you deserve. The attorney can advise you on when, how, and whom to sue for getting cancer.
With that said, here’s when you can sue for getting cancer:
- Product Liability
You can sue for getting cancer from a defective product. For example, in one hair product cancer lawsuit, a claim was made that a hair straightening product was causing uterine cancer in women. The defects in the hair product increase the risk of developing uterine cancer for whoever uses it. If you think you’re in a similar situation, you can sue the manufacturers if a certain product increases your risk of developing cancer.
However, proving your case and claiming compensation can be challenging. In such a case, you must prove the defective product caused your cancer to sue the manufacturer or retailer. You’ll have to request tests on the products to prove the defect and the relationship to cancer development. The product defect has to have caused your cancer diagnosis directly. One example is when the product has excessive amounts of lead. You’ll need to hire experts or resort to government authorities to investigate the product to prove this. This way, you have a piece of solid evidence to sue the product manufacturer.
- Medical Negligence
Medical negligence is one of the most common reasons to sue for getting cancer. You could sue for medical malpractice if the doctors, healthcare facility, hospital, or other medical professionals failed to offer the standard of care causing your cancer diagnosis. For example, if the doctor failed to order necessary tests or misdiagnosed your case resulting in cancer progression, you can sue for medical negligence.
To successfully sue for medical negligence, you must prove that the medical practitioner’s actions directly caused your cancer diagnosis. You must also show that you suffered damage because of the negligent actions of the medical practitioner. By doing so, you can claim compensation for treatment of progressing cancer, lost wages if you cannot work, and pain and suffering.
- Environmental Factors
Exposure to environmental pollutants and toxins is a common risk factor for cancer. Prolonged exposure to asbestos at the workplace, radiation, and other chemicals can increase cancer risk. If you can prove your cancer was caused by exposure to a certain environmental toxin like asbestos, consider suing the company or entity responsible for the pollutants.
Suppose a company’s activities produce excessive radiation that affects the population in a specific area and results in cancer. In that case, you can sue that company for exposing you to toxins that caused the development of your cancer.
Like the previous points, you must prove your cancer was directly caused by a specific substance you were exposed to. You’ll also have to show that the exposure was from the negligence of the company or entity you’re suing. Another aspect you must consider is the entity’s knowledge of the potential risks of exposing people to the toxin or substance. Since you’ll also claim that the company or entity was negligent, expose their bad practices that contributed to the development of your cancer.
Additionally, working in a hazardous environment may expose you to substances or toxins that can increase your cancer risk. For instance, if you’re a construction worker with constant exposure to asbestos, you’ll be at risk of developing cancer. Working as a firefighter can also expose you to asbestos and other carcinogenic substances that cause cancer.
You can sue your employer for getting cancer while working in a hazardous environment. To be successful, you must prove the cancer was caused directly by exposure to a specific chemical or substance at the workplace or in the line of duty. For example, getting cancer from asbestos exposure at a construction site.
In such a suit, you’ll claim compensation for the medical expenses covering the diagnosis and treatment, lost wages, damages for the pain and suffering caused to you and your family, and other associated costs.
Conclusion Getting a cancer diagnosis because of someone else’s negligence can be traumatizing and devastating. However, you can get a little relief through compensation for the medical expenses and other related damages, such as pain and suffering. The process of suing for getting cancer can be complicated, and it’d be best to hire an experienced lawyer to handle the litigation process. An attorney can also advise on the available legal options available and the compensation to seek.
Khalil ur Rehman is a proud born and raised in Abbottabad. Khalil has worked as a journalist for nearly a decade having contributed to several large publications including the Yahoo News and The Verge. As a journalist for The Hear Up, Khalil covers climate and science news. [email protected]